認定するCIPP-US合格受験記試験-試験の準備方法-更新するCIPP-US出題範囲
無料でクラウドストレージから最新のXhs1991 CIPP-US PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1imXk6CuOqTv8Bl9D8il1hwvlLOJqEomC
IT技術の急速な発展につれて、IT認証試験の問題は常に変更されています。したがって、Xhs1991のCIPP-US問題集も絶えずに更新されています。それに、Xhs1991の教材を購入すれば、Xhs1991は一年間の無料アップデート・サービスを提供してあげます。問題が更新される限り、Xhs1991は直ちに最新版のCIPP-US資料を送ってあげます。そうすると、あなたがいつでも最新バージョンの資料を持っていることが保証されます。Xhs1991はあなたが試験に合格するのを助けることができるだけでなく、あなたは最新の知識を学ぶのを助けることもできます。このような素晴らしい資料をぜひ見逃さないでください。
IAPPのCIPP-US認定試験は、アメリカ合衆国で個人データを扱うプロフェッショナルの知識と技能をテストする、世界的に認知された認定プログラムです。この試験は、米国のプライバシー法規制、データ保護、情報セキュリティ、リスク管理に関連する広範囲なトピックをカバーしています。この認定は、法務、コンプライアンス、リスク管理、IT、データセキュリティで働くプロフェッショナルに適しており、世界中の雇用主に認められています。
IAPP CIPP-US合格受験記: Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US) - Xhs1991 ベストプロバイダー
Xhs1991必要な内容を収集してIAPP分析し、CIPP-USトレーニングクイズに記入することで、試験受験者の98％以上が楽かつ効率的に試験に合格しました。 Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US)試験に関連する学習したいすべてのメッセージは、CIPP-US練習エンジンで見つけることができます。 Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US)環境で行われた変更および次の試験での予測は、それらによって以前にコンパイルされます。
認定情報プライバシープロフェッショナル/米国（CIPP/US）認定試験は、国際プライバシー専門家協会（IAPP）が管理する高度に称賛されている認定プログラムです。この認定は、情報プライバシー法と米国の実践の分野における個人の知識と専門知識を評価するように設計されています。この試験では、一般的なデータ保護規則（GDPR）、カリフォルニア消費者プライバシー法（CCPA）、健康保険の移植性および説明責任法（HIPAA）を含む、プライバシー法と規制に関連する幅広いトピックをカバーしています。
IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US) 認定 CIPP-US 試験問題 (Q137-Q142):
質問 # 137
What was unique about the action that the Federal Trade Commission took against B.J.'s Wholesale Club in 2005?
正解：B
解説：
Per the FTC Press Release in 2005, "BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc. has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that its failure to take appropriate security measures to protect the sensitive information of thousands of its customers was an unfair practice that violated federal law."
質問 # 138
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
Cheryl is the sole owner of Fitness Coach, Inc., a medium-sized company that helps individuals realize their physical fitness goals through classes, individual instruction, and access to an extensive indoor gym. She has owned the company for ten years and has always been concerned about protecting customer's privacy while maintaining the highest level of service. She is proud that she has built long-lasting customer relationships.
Although Cheryl and her staff have tried to make privacy protection a priority, the company has no formal privacy policy. So Cheryl hired Janice, a privacy professional, to help her develop one.
After an initial assessment, Janice created a first of a new policy. Cheryl read through the draft and was concerned about the many changes the policy would bring throughout the company. For example, the draft policy stipulates that a customer's personal information can only be held for one year after paying for a service such as a session with personal trainer. It also promises that customer information will not be shared with third parties without the written consent of the customer. The wording of these rules worry Cheryl since stored personal information often helps her company to serve her customers, even if there are long pauses between their visits. In addition, there are some third parties that provide crucial services, such as aerobics instructors who teach classes on a contract basis. Having access to customer files and understanding the fitness levels of their students helps instructors to organize their classes.
Janice understood Cheryl's concerns and was already formulating some ideas for revision. She tried to put Cheryl at ease by pointing out that customer data can still be kept, but that it should be classified according to levels of sensitivity. However, Cheryl was skeptical. It seemed that classifying data and treating each type differently would cause undue difficulties in the company's day-to-day operations. Cheryl wants one simple data storage and access system that any employee can access if needed.
Even though the privacy policy was only a draft, she was beginning to see that changes within her company were going to be necessary. She told Janice that she would be more comfortable with implementing the new policy gradually over a period of several months, one department at a time. She was also interested in a layered approach by creating documents listing applicable parts of the new policy for each department.
What is the best reason for Cheryl to follow Janice's suggestion about classifying customer data?
正解：C
質問 # 139
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
You are the chief privacy officer at HealthCo, a major hospital in a large U.S. city in state A. HealthCo is a HIPAA-covered entity that provides healthcare services to more than 100,000 patients. A third-party cloud computing service provider, CloudHealth, stores and manages the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of these individuals on behalf of HealthCo. CloudHealth stores the data in state B. As part of HealthCo's business associate agreement (BAA) with CloudHealth, HealthCo requires CloudHealth to implement security measures, including industry standard encryption practices, to adequately protect the data. However, HealthCo did not perform due diligence on CloudHealth before entering the contract, and has not conducted audits of CloudHealth's security measures.
A CloudHealth employee has recently become the victim of a phishing attack. When the employee unintentionally clicked on a link from a suspicious email, the PHI of more than 10,000 HealthCo patients was compromised. It has since been published online. The HealthCo cybersecurity team quickly identifies the perpetrator as a known hacker who has launched similar attacks on other hospitals - ones that exposed the PHI of public figures including celebrities and politicians.
During the course of its investigation, HealthCo discovers that CloudHealth has not encrypted the PHI in accordance with the terms of its contract. In addition, CloudHealth has not provided privacy or security training to its employees. Law enforcement has requested that HealthCo provide its investigative report of the breach and a copy of the PHI of the individuals affected.
A patient affected by the breach then sues HealthCo, claiming that the company did not adequately protect the individual's ePHI, and that he has suffered substantial harm as a result of the exposed data. The patient's attorney has submitted a discovery request for the ePHI exposed in the breach.
What is the most significant reason that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) might impose a penalty on HealthCo?
正解：C
解説：
According to the HIPAA Security Rule, covered entities are responsible for ensuring that their business associates comply with the security standards and safeguards required by the rule. This includes conducting due diligence to assess the business associate's security capabilities and practices, and monitoring their performance and compliance. Failure to do so may result in a violation of the rule and a penalty by the HHS.
In this scenario, HealthCo did not perform due diligence on CloudHealth before entering the contract, and did not conduct audits of CloudHealth's security measures. This is the most significant reason why HHS might impose a penalty on HealthCo, as it indicates a lack of oversight and accountability for the protection of ePHI. References:
* HIPAA Security Rule
* HIPAA Business Associate Contracts
* HIPAA Enforcement and Penalties
質問 # 140
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question;
Miraculous Healthcare is a large medical practice with multiple locations in California and Nevada.
Miraculous normally treats patients in person, but has recently decided to start offering teleheaith appointments, where patients can have virtual appointments with on-site doctors via a phone app For this new initiative. Miraculous is considering a product built by MedApps, a company that makes quality teleheaith apps for healthcare practices and licenses them to be used with the practices' branding. MedApps provides technical support for the app. which it hosts in the cloud MedApps also offers an optional benchmarking service for providers who wish to compare their practice to others using the service Riya is the Privacy Officer at Miraculous, responsible for the practice's compliance with HIPAA and other applicable laws, and she works with the Miraculous procurement team to get vendor agreements in place. She occasionally assists procurement in vetting vendors and inquiring about their own compliance practices. as well as negotiating the terms of vendor agreements Riya is currently reviewing the suitability of the MedApps app from a privacy perspective.
Riya has also been asked by the Miraculous Healthcare business operations team to review the MedApps' optional benchmarking service. Of particular concern is the requirement that Miraculous Healthcare upload information about the appointments to a portal hosted by MedApps What is the most practical action Riya can take to minimize the privacy risks of using an app for telehealth appointments?
正解：A
解説：
When handling sensitive data, such as protected health information (PHI) in compliance with HIPAA, it is crucial for covered entities, such as Miraculous Healthcare, to ensure that their business associates (e.g., MedApps) appropriately safeguard the data they process. While contracts like Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) establish the obligations of business associates, active oversight by the covered entity is a practical and necessary step to mitigate privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Why Active Oversight is the Best Option:
* Active oversight involves regular monitoring, audits, and reviews of MedApps' practices to ensure they comply with the agreed-upon privacy and security obligations.
* This approach allows Miraculous Healthcare to confirm that MedApps is implementing appropriate technical and organizational safeguards, such as encryption, secure access controls, and breach notification processes.
* It also ensures that MedApps remains compliant with HIPAA requirements over time, even if there are changes to the app, its services, or legal requirements.
Explanation of Options:
* A. Prevent MedApps from using copies of the patient data:While restricting MedApps from creating unnecessary data copies could reduce some risks, it is often impractical, especially for troubleshooting, app hosting, and support purposes. HIPAA does not require outright prevention of data copies, as long as PHI is appropriately safeguarded and used solely for permissible purposes.
* B. Require MedApps to obtain consent from all patients:Under HIPAA, covered entities (not business associates) are primarily responsible for obtaining patient consent or authorization where required. MedApps, as a business associate, processes PHI on behalf of Miraculous Healthcare and is not in a position to obtain consent directly from patients.
* C. Require MedApps to submit a SOC2 report:A SOC 2 (Service Organization Control 2) report can provide valuable assurance regarding MedApps' security, availability, and confidentiality practices.
However, this action alone does not mitigate all risks, as SOC 2 reports are point-in-time assessments and may not reflect ongoing compliance or address specific HIPAA requirements.
* D. Engage in active oversight of MedApps:This is the most practical and comprehensive approach.
Active oversight includes reviewing MedApps' privacy practices, conducting periodic assessments, and monitoring compliance with the Business Associate Agreement (BAA). It ensures that MedApps continues to protect PHI appropriately and addresses any privacy risks proactively.
Additional Context:
In the context of the optional benchmarking service, Riya should ensure:
* The uploaded data is de-identified or aggregated to comply with HIPAA's de-identification standard (45 CFR § 164.514) if possible.
* The use of PHI for benchmarking is explicitly addressed in the BAA or a separate agreement.
References from CIPP/US Materials:
* HIPAA Privacy Rule (45 CFR § 160.103 and 164.504): Describes the responsibilities of covered entities and business associates, including the need for BAAs and safeguards for PHI.
* NIST Privacy Framework and NIST SP 800-53: Provides guidance on implementing oversight mechanisms for third-party risk management.
* IAPP CIPP/US Certification Textbook: Discusses the importance of vendor management and active oversight in ensuring privacy compliance.
Conclusion:
Requiring MedApps to submit a SOC 2 report or restricting data use might address specific concerns but would not provide the comprehensive, ongoing protection necessary to reduce risks effectively. Engaging in active oversight is the most practical and effective action to minimize privacy risks while maintaining compliance with HIPAA.
質問 # 141
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION :
Declan has just started a job as a nursing assistant in a radiology department at Woodland Hospital. He has also started a program to become a registered nurse.
Before taking this career path, Declan was vaguely familiar with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). He now knows that he must help ensure the security of his patients' Protected Health Information (PHI). Therefore, he is thinking carefully about privacy issues.
On the morning of his first day, Declan noticed that the newly hired receptionist handed each patient a HIPAA privacy notice. He wondered if it was necessary to give these privacy notices to returning patients, and if the radiology department could reduce paper waste through a system of one-time distribution.
He was also curious about the hospital's use of a billing company. He questioned whether the hospital was doing all it could to protect the privacy of its patients if the billing company had details about patients' care.
On his first day Declan became familiar with all areas of the hospital's large radiology department. As he was organizing equipment left in the halfway, he overheard a conversation between two hospital administrators. He was surprised to hear that a portable hard drive containing non-encrypted patient information was missing. The administrators expressed relief that the hospital would be able to avoid liability. Declan was surprised, and wondered whether the hospital had plans to properly report what had happened.
Despite Declan's concern about this issue, he was amazed by the hospital's effort to integrate Electronic Health Records (EHRs) into the everyday care of patients. He thought about the potential for streamlining care even more if they were accessible to all medical facilities nationwide.
Declan had many positive interactions with patients. At the end of his first day, he spoke to one patient, John, whose father had just been diagnosed with a degenerative muscular disease. John was about to get blood work done, and he feared that the blood work could reveal a genetic predisposition to the disease that could affect his ability to obtain insurance coverage. Declan told John that he did not think that was possible, but the patient was wheeled away before he could explain why. John plans to ask a colleague about this.
In one month, Declan has a paper due for one his classes on a health topic of his choice. By then, he will have had many interactions with patients he can use as examples. He will be pleased to give credit to John by name for inspiring him to think more carefully about genetic testing.
Although Declan's day ended with many QUESTIONS, he was pleased about his new position.
What is the most likely way that Declan might directly violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)?
正解：A
解説：
"Other than for treatment, covered entities must make reasonable efforts to limit the use and disclosure of PHI to the minimum necessary in order to accomplish the intended purpose." He isn't involved in the potential breach, which is why he isn't trained for it, and doesn't know all the facts of the situation. He has not obligation doesn't need to investigate any further based on anything that he heard.
質問 # 142
......
CIPP-US出題範囲: https://www.xhs1991.com/CIPP-US.html
P.S. Xhs1991がGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいCIPP-USダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1imXk6CuOqTv8Bl9D8il1hwvlLOJqEomC
